Wednesday, 15 December 2010

Is Google Instant aimed at killing “I Feel Lucky” & making more money?

By now I’m sure everyone’s all seen and had a play around with the new Google Instant search interface. There’s lots of early reaction to this on the web, my own included on Econsultancy yesterday.

Obviously the main goal behind this is to provide results much more quickly and look to improve a searchers overall user experience. But has anyone else noticed that the “I feel lucky”, while still listed on the homepage, is actually now redundant?

Google Don't Be Evil
Image credit: Flickr

In my opinion, the majority of Google’s changes and updates look to achieve one of two things:

improve the relevancy of results for searchers, andmake more money

Ideally both!

However, Google Instant is about increasing speed and reducing the user journey required for searchers. But interestingly it looks like it will make them more money too.

By providing results as soon as you start typing, the new search function now bypasses the “I feel lucky” button, which has cost Google an incredible estimated $110 million dollars in potential revenue in the past! Any good conversion optimisation specialist (or accountant) would tell you to remove that button – which is effectively what Google have done. The only way you can click the “I feel lucky” button now is for an empty query string on the Google homepage, and this just takes you to the Google logos page.

So that’s clearly a great way of generating extra revenue and that’s all before taking into account the extra paid search ads being served for each query and the potential extra interstitial clicks generated while mid-query.

Also, for Google – the main reason they are such a huge money-making machine is their huge market share? As I mentioned in my Econsultancy comments, if Instant has a negative reaction this could be a good time for users to switch (most likely to Bing). So how this affects the user has to be the main objective first and foremost. Increasing the average value per searcher is also a goal they will be keen on improving further, and rightly so, but it does little to their revenue if the market share drops as a result.

So what do you think, is a major increase in revenue a key and intentional part of Google’s thinking in the launch of Instant?

Posted in google, seo |


View the original article here

Sunday, 12 December 2010

The Swiss Army Knife Of SEO Tools!

Here's How Even The Laziest, Most Technophobic Internet Marketer Can Almost Automatically Get All The High-Quality, Relevant Incoming Links You Want... Climb Your Way To The Top Of SEO Pile... And Drive More Qualified, Profitable And Free Traffic To Your Site...
Without Paying Out The Nose For A High Priced SEO "Expert"...

Without Spending All Your Time Suffering And Struggling In SEO Land...

And Faster Than You Ever Thought Possible Before! 


Friday, 10 December 2010

Top 10 tips & things you need to know about AdWords Remarketing

Tweet Posted on August 17th, 2010 by Rob Hillyard

This is a guest post from Rob Hillyard at Return on Digital.

AdWords Remarketing

Create a brand new campaign for Remarketing. This will enable you to monitor how everything is doing much easier than running it within an existing campaign.You need at least 500 people in your target list before Google will start to show your ads. Depending on how much traffic your site gets and who you are targeting, it could take a couple of days before you see any traffic.Image ads work best. Make sure you include all the possible image sizes to allow your ads to receive the largest amount of impressions possible.Use a different message than your standard ads to bring the users back to your site. This is your second chance to convert the visitor into a customer. Special offers / discounts work well.If you include an offer in your ad make sure you mirror this offer on your landing page.Plan who you want to remarket to. You need to know your strategy before you start your implementation.A Good place to start is to remarket to people who visited your site but didn’t convert.Control how long people will see your remarketing ads for. Being constantly targeted by one advertiser can be annoying and you don’t want to put people off your brand.Your ads may be displayed on sites that wouldn’t normally be seen as relevant. This is ok. Users are targeted based on previous interactions with your site rather than the content of the website.Your ads will follow your users around sites within the Google Content Network. This can be quite annoying. Consider allowing users to opt out. http://www.google.com/ads/preferences/view

For the full guide on how to set up Remarketing, check out this post.

Posted in google, google adwords, ppc |


View the original article here

Tuesday, 7 December 2010

Top SEOptimise posts in July – a monthly recap…

Tweet Posted on August 5th, 2010 by Kevin Gibbons

a4uexpoJuly has been another busy month at SEOptimise – and seeing that we are currently writing around the web, I thought it would be a good time to share these posts with SEOptimise readers and recap on the top posts we’ve written here on the blog.

Plus I have been confirmed as a speaker at a4uexpo London in October, this is on the “20 Social Media Tools & 20 WordPress Plugins Boost Your Performance” day two session. We also sent out the latest installment of the SEOptimise newsletter yesterday – signup here if you haven’t already!

SEOptimise around the web…

For those who do not follow my writing on Econsultancy or Search Engine Watch, here are the latest posts from July – plus an interview on State of Search:

Top SEOptimise posts in July

Oh and plus the office have followed the foursquare craze this week, with the race on to become the mayor of SEOptimise!

Posted in seoptimise |


View the original article here

Thursday, 2 December 2010

How to Manage & Grow Your Social Media Network

Tweet Posted on September 20th, 2010 by Kevin Gibbons

One of the problems and frustrations I find with social media, is that there are now many different website’s and each of them require managing contacts in different ways.

So, for example, you’ll often end up with a completely different set of contacts on each site – when in many cases it would make far more sense if you were just connected to the same people on Twitter, LinkedIn, Foursquare etc.

Because each of these sites have their own friend/follow system, it’s pretty much impossible to keep track of everyone you’re connected to. This means that if you sign-up for a new social media website, like I did recently on FourSquare, you have to start all over again by adding contacts from scratch.

It is possible to import friends on many of the sites by importing your Twitter or Facebook contacts – but that doesn’t always allow for everyone you’re connected with elsewhere. Recently, I’ve tried to manage this in a more central location, using the following steps:
Go export crazy! The first step is to get an email list of contacts from Facebook, LinkedIn and any other social media sites with contact list exporting available. Sometimes you have to dig around for export options, but it’s normally available – even if they do try to insult you through not so subtle captchas!
LinkedInCollect all contacts into GMail or FlowTown - This helps you to organise all of your contacts into a single location. Personally I find FlowTown to be very useful – especially for analysing demographics – but GMail does the job here too and is free (FlowTown charges per import).
FlowtownGroup contacts - Filter those who you’d like to connect with on all sites and if you want to be more selective over who you connect with, then it’s useful to separate professional contacts with friends and family.
FlowtownImport connections – most social networking sites have the option to import contacts via CSV or GMail – so once you’ve collected and organised all of your contacts into a central location you can look to import these into each of the social media website’s you use.
Twitter Import

I tried this out a few weeks ago on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, StumbleUpon and Foursquare – instantly finding new contacts who I’m already connected to on other sites. So from my point of view, it’s been a far more efficient way of managing and merging social contacts – has anyone found a good way of managing contacts across social media networks?

Posted in social media |


View the original article here

Saturday, 27 November 2010

35 SEO & Social Media Expert Interviews

Three of the most trusted SEO and social media experts, Rhea Drysdale, Tamar Weinberg and Lee Odden. Photo by toprankonlinemarketing.

Interviews are often overlooked pieces of distilled wisdom. They aren’t very popular on social media but they definitely should be! In interviews experts often provide the most valuable nuggets of their knowledge in a very concise form. You need to study dozens of other blog posts to learn as much.

Moreover experts often tend to focus on one aspect a time when they write something themselves, even when compiling a list like this. On the other hand interviews focus on several key questions an expert wouldn’t even attempt to cover in one blog post or seminar. These facts combined result in in a very condensed piece of advice.

Also it’s quite difficult to determine who’s a real expert and who is not in the SEO industry and even more in social media marketing.
When someone gets interviewed s/he’s either popular or an expert or both. The difficulty in compiling this list of interviews was not finding 30 of them but sorting out the less valuable ones from the dozens there are. Also I wanted to feature not only the people everybody knows already like Rand Fishkin or Matt Cutts. There are numerous interviews with them.

Some true experts hide behind an invisible persona as an inhouse SEO and/or social media expert

but really have something to say others haven’t. So I added a few of inhouse SEO expert from big enterprises.

Last but not least I couldn’t find good interview that offers deep insights with some of the brightest minds of the industry like Danny Sullivan or Barry Schwartz. There were either too short, shallow, outdated or too much focused on a specific event or topic. Add those in the comment section if you think they are must read. I repeat, I didn’t just look at the names, I solely selected those interviews that offer real insights.

OK, enough of this, follow the links  below to read the interviews with some of the most renowned SEO and social media experts.

SEO experts

Inhouse SEO experts

Social Media experts

Matt Cutts and other Google employees

Business Blogging experts

To be honest: A list of interviews with experts in both SEO and social media could have been a top 100, 200 or 2000. Due to time and reader attention limitations I had to choose approx. 30 of them. Don’t think just because I haven’t included someone s/he isn’t an expert. It was a really tough choice.

I even included an interview with myself without being sure whether people consider me an expert but I was quite sure that I provided some unique insights in this interview.

So accept my apologies for not being on the list please!

Btw. how do I know who’s an expert and who is not? Difficult question. I think I’m at least expert enough by now to determine who is an expert on the subject of SEO and social media.

The interviews above have been conducted between 2008 and 2010. For hundreds of SEO & social media interviews from 2008 and earlier visit this huge list by Donna Fontenot.

Posted in blogging, google, seo, social media |


View the original article here

Wednesday, 24 November 2010

How to Write Highly Popular 30+ Item List Blog Posts to Get Links and Traffic

Time flies by. It’s more than two years by now that I write the highly popular “30+” list blog posts to get links and traffic for SEOptimise. I’ve often tried to abandon them, to write tutorials or other types of postings but list posts with around 30 items still rule. They get the most

shares on social medialinksattentiontraffic

for several reasons.

This year some of the big guys in the SEO blogosphere started doing 30 something lists as well, SEOmoz does them, SEL compiles them. They even surpass my lists in some cases as they spend obviously more time on them than I do. Their success with this technique has just confirmed to me that 30+ lists work. That’s why I will tell you how to write them.

In the web design/web development niche even more people publish lists like that all the time.

Why 30?

For some reason 30+ lists are better suited for the Web than top 10, 20 or wahtever lists. I have a few ideas why that is the case but these ideas are just speculation. What I do know for sure is that the so called task ROI of most 30+ lists is higher than the top 10, whatever or top 100 lists.

One crucial success factor is that people tend to think in dozens not necessarily tens IMHO.

The decimal system makes us read and write top 10, top 20 or top 100 lists but the more “natural” way to count is by using dozens as in twelve hours. That’s why a number like 36 sounds better to many of us. Even though 30 is two and a half dozens this number just seems to entice people to read.

Also most people are tired of top 10 and 20 lists, they have been overused. Here again 30+ sounds more natural.

Last but not least you simply can’t compile a list of 100 items without broadening the topic or lowering the quality of the list.

Most lists are comprehensive enough with around 30 items.

More items would often be redundant or less relevant. A top 10 list also implies a personal selection of some kind. You have to choose “the best” 10 while 30 items cover a subject in depth.

That’s why I sometimes even reduce the number of items in a list, at least in the headline. One of my favorite lists has been the one about advanced SEO which contained 55+ links but only around 30 items officially.

Delicious

I collect great posts from SEO blogs in my Delicious account onreact.com and I tag them according to a set of rules. I add mostly tags I’ve used in the past to categorize these posting in relevant groups.

Then from time to time I take a look at some of the tags and those that contain more than 10 or 20 items get my attention. Sometimes they are almost thirty already so I just have to copy and paste the links. I delete the unworthy ones and add some from outside my Delicious bookmarks but the bulk of the work has been done while reading social media, search and SEO news in the morning each day.

Sometimes I have to combine several tags into one trend. The brutal thruths about Google, SEO etc. have been such a list. It was clear to me that there was a trend in the industry to write about the less glamorous parts of the SEO game but I couldn’t name it. Then the inspiration came out of nowhere and I have found the common ground to add it up to a list.

In some cases I don’t use Delicious at all. I simply get inspired and write down approx. 30 items from the top of my head.

Twitter

From time to time I use Twitter to crowdsource list items. The SEO FAQ list heavily relied on input from my Twitter followers. Also the black hat SEO techniques list has grown with a little help of my friends.

You have to ask the right questions and offer incentives though. The SEO FAQ offered both backlinks and content for those who took part. I asked my Twitter followers about the black hat SEO techniques their arch enemies use. Otherwise people would probably mostly stay low key.

Link list or item list?

A simple link list is not the best kind of list. Sometimes I just have to compile a list of resources and link  them beacuse there are so many of them. Such a list can overwhelm though. Many people like lists because they want to have a quick overview about a subject, not a huge reading list. Therefore a combined text item list with added links for further reading is the best option. This way you get both kinds of list readers, the save for later bunch as well as the quick overview group.

A simple link list will not be as popular as an item list with added links to prove the points. Still both list formats are highly popular. A 30+ list post done in 4h will get more traction on the Web than a tutorial that took 6 or 8h to write.

Linking out

Another key factor leading to the overwhelming success of my lists posts in general is the massive amount of outbound links. While many SEOs are still stuck in the past and attempt to hoard PageRank and trap users like the news media do I rely on linking out for SEO reasons.

We already know that Google prefers sites that link out

(after all they need outgoing links to determine their PageRank algo) but have no proof yet that they affect rankings directly.

What’s obvious though is that people who you are linking to will link back to you, spread the word on social media and support your blog or even business in the future.

So at the end of the day the fact that I link out to dozens of other blogs get me traffic and links in significant numbers.

Contrary to popular wisdom SEOptimise has improved in rankings in recent years ever since we link out in large numbers. SEOptimise ranks in the top 10 for some of the most competitive search marketing terms while being a relatively small agency compared to the competition.

Also the lists themselves tend to rank quite well. SEOptimise ranks top 3 for [advanced SEO], [SEO techniques] or [social media statistics].

The secret is our broad, organic backlink structure build up by business blogging utilizing these highly popular 30+ items list posts.

Posted in blogging, linkbait, seoptimise, social media, twitter |


View the original article here

Friday, 19 November 2010

Sunday, 14 November 2010

My Thoughts On Google Instant

Everyone is talking about Google Instant; the new way for Google to display results.

Image from Zenera on Flickr

The basics are covered in many places:

I want to talk a bit less about the implementation and a bit more about the implications. It is too early to say anything for sure but here are my thoughts on how the new Google UI will alter the PPC landscape.

1. There will be more impressions
Impressions on Google Instant are counted differently to normal. Even thought Google are not recording impressions willy nilly (the user must interact with the page or wait 3 seconds) the total number of AdWords adverts served will increase. The interesting aspect is how these extra impressions will be distributed rather than if there will be extra impressions or not (they have to go somewhere).

2. The number of clicks will increase
This one is much more of a guess than point 1. I can’t see the number of AdWords clicks dropping so it will either stay the same or increase. I’m going to go with “increase” for two reasons:

I can’t imagine Google making a change that hits their bottom lineOrganic results are pushed even further down the page.

3. CTR will blah, blah, blah
Who cares? Aside from quality score implications (discussed below) who gives a shit about CTR? Joking aside, I think this one will go both ways. On the one hand, there will be more impressions so CTR may go down. On the other hand the page interaction criteria for an impression to count introduces a sampling bias in what is counted as an impression.

4. Quality Score
Make up some quality score numbers and perform the quality score calculation as it is described by Google. Now reduce the score for you and the you-1 ranked ad by 10% and repeat the calculation. Your CPC has not changed! The point I am trying to make it that I believe it is your quality score relative to other advertisers that matters. If the new interface penalises everyone equally then there is nothing to worry about. Of course, any advertiser who can find away to avoid a drop in quality score when everyone else is failing … ;-)

5. Redefining the “Head”
A lot of people are talking about bidding on “stem” queries in order to capture searchers earlier in their query. For example an advertiser selling widgets may bid on “wikipedia” or “widnes” because these searches are triggered before the user has finished typing “widgets”. I don’t see this as being a massive game changer; it is no different to an advertiser selling black nike football boots bidding on “football boots”. The top of the head has been made bigger (the head now has a “hat”) but that is all. The game is still the same, but the pitch is larger.

6. The shorter, fatter tail
I expect to see the number of different queries drop as people are steered down well defined search paths. However, it is important to remember that the suggestions aren’t set in stone so that discarding a keyword because it doesn’t appear in the suggestion box may mean that opportunities are missed later on.

7. CPCs
CPCs may increase on head keywords that are stem phrases for valuable queries. Morrissons may start paying more for their brand terms in order to stay ahead of people trying to target people looking for mortgages. For keywords in the tail CPCs should fall; aggregating traffic from a larger number of search queries into one query will result in a small amount of inefficiancy that wasn’t there before; this should cause CPCs to fall (use the comments to correct me if I’m wrong). What I think will actually happen is that a larger number of advertisers bidding on a smaller number of keywords will cause CPCs to increase.

Posted in google adwords, ppc |


View the original article here

Wednesday, 10 November 2010

40 Google Instant SEO, SEM & Analytics Resources

Image by Westside Shooter.

Google Instant is the talk of the town not only in the SEO industry. While some people still hope SEO will go away most experts agree that SEO is either just changing a bit or now more important than ever due to the recent changes. So I won’t list most of the usual “SEO is not dead” posts here as I expect you to know that. I’ll focus on what the instant search results will mean for SEO, SEM and analytics in reality.

Check out the following 40 Google Instant SEO, SEM & analytics resources list. Btw. The last item is probably the best one.

What is Google Instant all about

IMHO Google Instant is just Google Suggest on Speed. The first four suggestions from Google Suggest get shown in Google Instant now. As of now only registered and logged in users see it so its impact may be not yet that huge. Google wants to roll it out to all others though in future. Click the links below for more exact definitions and broader explanations.

What are the motivations behind Google Instant?

Speed is the official motivation behind the new search interface but some pundits including Kevin Gibbons of SEOptimise suspect monetization as the key idea behind Google Instant.

What are the issues with Google Instant?

Is Google Instant really better? Many people encountered problems like distraction, censorship, or downright irrelevant results. Find out more about them. The owners of Naked Pizza will have to rethink their branding strategy it seems because NSFW results don’t show up.

What are the ramifications of Google Instant for SEO, SEM, analytics etc.

Most people seem to agree that the long tail, that is often exotic search queries with 3 or more keywords will get used less by searchers. On the flip side people will probably at least in some cases follow the trail laid out by Google Instant and click search results from partial queries. Sadly Google Analytics won’t show partial queries you ranked for. Instead Google will always send the “predicted query” as part of the referrer. 

Google Instant SEO Techniques

How do we adapt to the new search interface? How do we explain the changes to clients?
Do we have to optimize for partial queries now? Do you have to try to rank for flow when you sell flowers? Questions like these arise and get answered already by some SEO practicioners. Apparently others already practice black hat SEO for Google Instant, make sure to click the last item for these techniques.

What else? Last time Google has introduced a big change to its search result interface it hasn’t worked out due to unnecessary complexity. Do you remember the Google SearchWiki (NOT the SideWiki)? You could add, remove, move and comment on search results. I really liked it but most people got annoyed by the new options. This time I expect many people to get annoyed as well. Some of the articles linked above already mention that.

So Google Instant might disappear within a year like Google SearchWiki did. So don’t panic and change your SEO strategy altogether. Keep in mind that you should try to act independently and not follow every whim of Google. Keep calm and add more content, promote it and get links. You should be fine with that, mo matter the search interface.

Posted in google, google analytics, ppc, seo, website analytics |


View the original article here

Sunday, 7 November 2010

50+ Advanced Web Analytics Tools for Business Use [2010 Edition]

Web analytics is perhaps the most important discipline for businesses online. In case you don’t know who and why visits you, buys your products and talks about you, you are blind on the Web.

Web analytics goes beyond simple SEO metrics.

It’s about

among others.

Additionally, with the huge influence of social media, it’s more important than ever to monitor social media buzz. While some people still assume that there are no social media measurement tools there are already dozens out there.

So check out these 50+ advanced web analytics tools for business use. It’s the updated 2010 edition. Of course I assume that you know by now the industry standard solution Google Analytics.

This list has been first compiled in February, 2009 so I decided to update and republish it 18 months later. I’ve removed, added and changed numerous links.

Make sure not to miss the Social Media analytics solutions at the bottom of the list.

Free and/or Affordable Analytics Solutions

Search Analytics

Heat Maps and Usability Tracking

Enterprise Analytics

Hosted/Server Side Solutions

Twitter & Facebook Analytics

Social Media Analytics

Enterprise Social Media Monitoring Tools

Thanks to the colleagues of @GuavaUK for suggesting CoreMetrics and Unica on Twitter. Also thanks to SEMPlanning.com for providing a huge list of social media buzz tracking tools I used while researching.

This post was first published on February 26th, 2009. It was last updated on August 20th, 2010.

Tags: heat maps, metrics, social media analytics, stats, tools, web analytics
Posted in seo, social media, twitter, website analytics |


View the original article here

Wednesday, 3 November 2010

New Digg Review: Is Digg V4 the Next Twitter?

Typical Digg comment thread.

Last week the new Digg version 4 has been released and I have tested it ever since. Back in the days I was a staunch opponent of Digg and an avid supporter of competing services like StumbleUpon and Mixx. That was years ago though. Both Mixx and SU have stagnated over time. So I decided to take a look at the new Digg. Maybe it has been fixed now?

Most business people have been either expelled from the first wave of social sites like StumbleUpon, Digg and Mixx or moved on of their own accord to more mature sites like Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn that don’t discriminate against business users and are not full of NSFW images.

Digg has deteriorated over the years to become a cesspool full of sexism and a battle ground for teenage boy’s flame wars.

It’s not as bad as competitor Reddit which ended up being the place for hate-mongers and rants though.

With version four Kevin Rose, known for his misguided antipathy against the SEO industry, tries to save what’s left of an originally good idea: social news. Can he beat Twitter and Facebook and most importantly his own community that has made Digg the hellhole it was until now?

Following

Digg seems to aim at both Twitter and StumbleUpon. It’s very similar to both services. You have to follow users or publications and see their activity.

Similar to Twitter main stream “blogs” like TechCrunch or Mashable have an overwhelming advantage this way. They have already tens of thousands of followers who vote anything up they see. Understandably many people don’t like this feature as some major publishers can dominate the frontpage this way.

On the other hand the follow feature revives “old” and not yet popular stories on Digg. Until now only front page stories could get substantial traffic from Digg. Most of these visitors were terribly untargeted though and left in an instant so that you got a huge server load while not getting much in return. Unless of course you got links. Thus Digg has been used by many for link building for years.

Once a story has hit the fp it could garner a substantial number of links. This is still true to some extent but with Facebook and Twitter getting more popular you don’t get as many links these days anymore.

I got notified about someone following me. That’s why I joined the new Digg in the first place. Sadly most follwoers do not see your submissions it seems. Everything you do gets shown to them so that submissions get overlooked when you digg other people’s submissions and comment.

Comments

The most dreaded and for some people entertaining (in a freak show kind of way) part of Digg was the comment section. As Digg adds no other value beyond the selection of stories and commenting many people read those. Unfortunately especially women and business people were appalled but the blatant sexism, aggressive NSFW battleground that comment section was. In V4 of Digg the site attempts to clean up the comment section.

The most approved of comments get displayed on top if you select the right option in the preferences. Some flame comments by trolls are below the display threshold and can only be seen on click. You can hide comments below a certain number of votes. I strongly approve of this measure. Can you use Digg again during work hours and even without watching Fight Club first? Not really.

A comment that disagreed with my opinion started with “F**k you!” and got at least 14 votes so that no threshold could have stopped it. My comment containing no swear words has been of course buried. My sin? I expressed my sadness about homeless people protesting for cheap meals in the US while at the same time their government can afford wars and military bases throughout the world. Being from Germany I express often unpopular views for Americans so that most probably I still will be verbally attacked and abused on the new Digg it seems.

Bury button

The feature that was perhaps the other most devastating one for Digg was the so called “bury button”. Using it a self proclaimed Digg police blocked whole topics, e.g. SEO. So basically you weren’t allowed to talk about SEO. The only SEO related posts that were acceptable on Digg were SEO bashing postings. This perpetuated the ignorance on the Digg platform to the point where everything posted on an SEO publication has been boycotted.

At the same spammers have been using Digg to submit their SEO adverts all the time. The bury button led to the effective exclusion of high quality SEO resources while low quality SEO and downright spam about SEO services has been prevalent on Digg. Just search Digg for SEO and you’ll find solely crap submissions, mostly not even in English.

Digg V4 has no bury button anymore. This way resources about SEO theoretically can get popular on Digg again as there is no direct censorship anymore. I doubt though there are enough people interested in the subject. I’m optimistic though that search marketing publications can get exposure on Digg for general technology and Internet postings. Search Engine Land is already on Digg.

The removal of the bury button is an overdue measure to restore democratic voting patterns on Digg. Until now a small minority of maybe a few dozens people have effectively blocked SEO related resources.

The new Digg has a report button instead. I reported myself for instance when a story accidentally got submitted twice by the system. I also reported a submission consisting of dozens of stolen images. We’ll see whether the Digg staff will act on these.

Will I stay on the new Digg?

I don’t know yet. I’m probably not masochistic enough to let people shout at me for expressing my opinions which are quiet common sense (like anti-war) in Europe. Maybe I’ll use Digg as a combination of both Twitter and Facebook. I’ll follow my favorite users and publications and ignore the frontpage and comments altogether. Instead I will “like” their submissions by “digging” them. On the other hand I’m not convinced I need another site to follow them.

People in the SEO industry still push their infographics, lists or other linkbaits on Digg, I guess 1/3 of Digg’s content are linkbaits while the rest are mainstream blogs or publications plus funny or “awesome” images. As I don’t like most of these and SEO publications have no audience there I don’t think it makes business sense for me.

In case you’re into linkbaits, just take some almost naked female celebrity pics or something “Apple”, put it on your blog and the Digg audience will still love it. Digg even says in its meta keyword tag that it’s about “celebrity news” among others.

Posted in facebook, seo, social media, twitter |


View the original article here

Friday, 29 October 2010

Top 16 Tweets from #BrightonSEO

Tweet Posted on July 24th, 2010 by Kevin Gibbons

Following my BrightonSEO presentation yesterday, I thought it would be a good idea to use one of the WordPress plugins I recommended, Blackbird Pie, to recap the top tweets from the day:
















It’s actually incredibly quick to write a post like this, all you need to do is install the plugin and insert the tweet URL into your post using the format: [blackbirdpie url=”http://twitter.com/kevgibbo/status/19346618549?].

Posted in conferences |


View the original article here

Monday, 25 October 2010

How to achieve excellence in joined-up marketing – #JUMPchallenge

This post is part of the #JUMPchallenge, a blogging competition designed raise awareness on how to join up online and offline marketing, launched to support Econsultancy’s JUMP event.

Jump
Image credit: Flickr

It’s essential that the different elements of your marketing reinforce one another if your budget is going to generate the highest possible returns.

Search marketing, traditional marketing and PR cannot happen in isolation from each other, or you will inevitably end up spending more than you need to on a less-effective campaign.

Join your marketing up well and you’ll develop a powerful corporate persona, provide seamless service to new and existing customers, and free-up more budget by eliminating waste.

So, with all these benefits, how do you join up your marketing? I thought I’d examine some of the different strands and take a look at how each can work more effectively with the rest of the marketing mix.

How to join-up PR and everything

PR is a vital element of your marketing strategy, it feeds into everything. PR is about managing your name. After all, without a decent reputation, the rest of your marketing is going nowhere.

Don’t forget as well that your PR executive or team are paid to keep their fingers on the pulse of your industry. They can be a trove of knowledge about coming trends, current issues and consumer concerns.

Your link builders can brainstorm ideas with the PR team and your email marketers can plan their campaign calendar with their help.

Often, your PR exec is also the best person to take up the reins of your social media strategy.

Twitter, Facebook and other social platforms are excellent PR tools, and it’s a great idea to have your company spokespeople blogging (check out my free blogging whitepaper for an in-depth look at why blogs are such a powerful tool).

That means your SEO team can return the favour and guide your PR exec in blogging best practice, boosting your website’s organic optimisation and cementing your corporation reputation with thoughtful insights.

It’s a virtuous circle of joined-up marketing excellence.

How to join-up SEO and everything

Finally the rest of the marketing world is starting to realise what I have been banging on about for years – SEO is not some technical website extra, it should be considered at every stage of your online marketing.

For example, your SEO team understand the terms you need to rank more highly for – they need to be in a position to feed this back to your PR team. That way, your press releases, social media work and blog content can be tailored to include these important phrases.

The SEO team should be included in all copywriting work for your site so that they can guide the copywriter in what’s needed to make your pages sparkle for search engine crawlers as well as for human visitors.

Plus, there’s a load of useful information being gathered around the company that your SEO team could benefit from.

What subject lines did best in the email marketing tests? That can feed into their PPC copy. What industry blogs were most popular on Twitter this month? That can feed into their link building work.

Although all elements of marketing are important, I think that PR and SEO should underpin everything a company does.

How to join-up email marketing and everything

Don’t view your email marketing as solely selling your products or services. Change your perspective and see it as a vehicle for marketing your entire company.

There’s great potential for your email to provide a platform for your other work and still drive interested customers to your products.

For example, you could add ‘Find us on Facebook’ and ‘Follow us on Twitter’ buttons to your emails.

You could include links to recent blog posts on your own site, or maybe even guest blog posts elsewhere (if you’re finding it hard to negotiate a guest post on a high-authority blog, offering to include it in your newsletter can be a great bargaining chip).

Perhaps some of your more skilled SEO copywriters or PR execs could write a newsletter to enhance your marketing? This can make your communication more effective and also boost your brand’s reputation among the recipients.

How to join-up social media and everything

I went to a pub the other day and there was a ‘Find us on Facebook’ sticker on the door. That’s great, keeping social media in mind at every point is really useful in terms of customer engagement.

The more opportunities you have to engage socially with the customer, the better. It massively enhances customer loyalty, as well as keeping your brand at the front of their mind when they next make a purchase.

Some social media marketers may feel they face a bit of a battle showing the value of what they do to the rest of the team. For example, perhaps your email marketing copywriter won’t want to include a ‘Follow us on Twitter’ button because it won’t take clickers to a sales page.

Your business needs to be more long-sighted than this. By building followers and fans, your company is creating a hardcore of loyal customers – people it can communicate with in a fun and social way. A click to Twitter is not a wasted click.

By giving discounts and special offers to fans, you can drive sales without intruding on anyone. You’ll also find it easier to get people to tweet your blog posts, share your content and rave about your deals – all of which feeds back beautifully into PR and SEO.

How to join up your offline and online marketing

Many small and medium-sized enterprises simply don’t bother with offline marketing, because the web is a far more cost-effective place to promote themselves.

However, offline marketing such as posters, newspaper, TV and radio adverts still work for major brands. There’s also similar great scope for local offline marketing for smaller companies, in the local press, for example.

But how can this join-up with your online marketing? Just as with email marketing, your offline promotions should show that there are even more value-adding perks available online.

For great discounts and sneak previews, find us on Facebook.

Find more great recipes back on our website.

Follow us on Twitter for more competitions.

You have limited space in any offline promotion but unlimited space online. Direct people to the web when you can and you’ll have more space to play with and another chance to win their custom.

How to join-up your team

Okay, this is perhaps the most important piece of advice in this entire post. Your marketing won’t be joined-up until the various relevant teams are working together.

Some large businesses will have whole teams dedicated to the different marketing strands I have outlined here – and it is essential these teams get to know each other.

You want them to communicate more effectively, brainstorm ideas with each other and share their skills. You need to facilitate that as much as possible.

Start by bringing the teams together and sitting them around the same desks if possible. Explain your marketing ambitions and encourage them to see themselves as part of one large team rather than their own smaller functions.

If your SEO is done by an agency like mine then ask for your search executive to come and work from your office for a few days, to build a good working relationship with your in-house marketers.

If this is a major change for your marketers then invest in some team-building fun. Send them off for a meal together or a team-building day or drinks. It’s worth it.

Your marketing can’t be joined up until your whole team – email marketers, link builders, paid search executives, the lot – see themselves as part of a bigger team and wider strategy.

Posted in conferences, online marketing |


View the original article here

Friday, 22 October 2010

WTF is Going On With Ad Group Bid Simulator?

Tweet Posted on August 5th, 2010 by Richard Fergie

On July 19th I noticed that I could us the AdWords Bid Simulator tool at the ad group level rather than at the keyword level as is normal. I thought this was a very useful feature so I tweeted:

Later that week I thought I should email our Google rep to say how great this new tool was. However, when I went to look at the account I couldn’t see this option. I emailed her with

Early last week I thought I saw the Bid Simulator tool available at the Ad Group level. I was going to say thank you for adding this very useful feature but now I can’t see it anymore. Was I included in a beta for this or was I going mad? Either way, this feature would be very useful.

She replied with:

With regards to the bid simulator tool it is currently only available at the keyword level.There currently isn't a Beta for bid simulator at the ad group level but I will pass this feedback onto our Product team that this is something that you would find useful.

I actually questioned my sanity until I saw this yesterday:

I screenshotted to prove my sanity at a later date and emailed our rep the details. She replied

This is really strange because when I look in the account from my side and follow the same steps that you have in your screenshot I am not able to see the option.

When I check the account today there is no evidence of ad group bid simulator:

WTF is going on?

Posted in seo |


View the original article here

Sunday, 17 October 2010

30 Content SEO, Marketing, Creation, Strategy & Promotion Insights + Resources

Chess by Alejandro Fernandez

Everybody seems to agree with the “content is king” mantra. At the same time most articles, blog posts in and outside the SEO industry seemed to ignore it. Not anymore: Content SEO and marketing resources are ubiquitous in 2010.

SEO blogs used to deal with other aspects of Web strategy. Content has often been taken for granted and thus on page optimization, web design, usability and link building took center stage all the time.

Good, great or even killer content for flagship blogs isn’t there automatically.

Just publishing anything and doing SEO for it won’t suffice. You have to really craft outstanding content these days to get noticed at all.

So how do we write or create content that spreads like wildfire on the Web? That’s not not as easy as some people assume. You need a content strategy in the first place, a high quality

“flagship” blog

imagesvideosinfographicsebookswidgets

or other highly valuable content types. These 30 content SEO, marketing, creation, strategy & promotion insights + resources should enable you to perform high quality content SEO campaigns.

Over the years many people have contested the notion that content is king.Most critics of king content have argued that content by itself is not enough.It doesn’t work the way some people want to make you believe “just create good content and the rest will follow”.You need to use several SEO and marketing techniques to spread the word about your content.Social media are key to get your content in front of an audience.Unless you do black hat SEO where you feign content where there is none every serious SEO campaign needs content. Ethical SEO is only possible via content. Where there is no content there is nothing to find by the search engines and thus nothing to optimize either. So SEO starts with content creation in many if not most cases.Most business websites offer only low quality content. Some of it can’t be even considered content at all because it has no other function than to advertise a company. Ads are not content and a website solely filled with overselling copy has no content. Content always needs to have some value. Likewise good ads can be considered content in case they consist of more than a sales pitch.SEO content is in most cases considered a derogative term. In fact so called SEO copywriting can in many cases not be described as content. It’s simply stuffing to feed search engine spiders with relevant keywords. Such spammy SEO techniques are rooted in the past where some SEO practicioners only cared for rankings and nothing beyond. Stuffing, as in keyword stuffing leads to a high bounce rate and low engagement. People don’t read stuffing, they are after real content. Thus I refer to content SEO here, not SEO content or “old school” SEO copywriting simply for the sake of mentioning keywords.For content SEO you have to create value. The values comes first the SEO follows. In design we say form follows function. In SEO we could say SEO follows content. It’s not that simple though. SEO and content are intertwined. You don’t create content first and think of the SEO later. You think strategically. What content can improve my SEO?Ever since the dawn of Universal Search where image, video, news, map and other results have entered the main organic search index on Google content via SEO means not just text or more than text. It means more media types even if only text is involved. PDF ebooks or white papers are good examples.Excellent content doesn’t appear out of nowhere. Creativity often needs a goal to be able to create something. In the best case you have a set of goals for the long term you want to achieve with your content strategy. The SEOptimise blog had a few goals when it started: branding, traffic generation, link building, readership growth. Sounds obvious doesn’t it? Well, it isn’t, a blog content strategy may entail other goals: lead generation, earning ad revenue or even sales could be long term business blog goals. Currently I run or write for four flagship blogs. Each of them has a different goal set aka content strategy.Your content strategy has to be aligned with your overall business goals. Are you trying to raise awareness and funds like most non-profits attempt to? Do you want to increase sales like most ecommerce businesses want to? Are you in the selling subscriptions business like many media or software as a service/SaaS providers?You have to determine your niche and audience, find out where they reside and address them accordingly. They may be on Facebook, Twitter, StumbleUpon or in forums.Your customers are just part of your audience. To reach them you need to address influencers and connectors first. These people, often social media users, bloggers and journalists will spread the word for you. Your content strategy must include incentives for these people to link to you and make their friends and other online connections aware of you and your content.Perhaps most crucial aspect of the average content strategy is to create a reputation as a trustworthy source of information. Trust is the real PageRank and is increasingly reflected in search results. Google and other search engines measure trust using different methods. You can’t fake trust the long run, you have to earn it. You have to create trusted content.
Sales copy or keyword stuffed gibberish is not content. Content has a value for and by itself. See it this way: Content is what is inside the bottle, its the wine, sales copy is the label saying it’s red wine from France. The label leads people to the content bus is not the content in itself. Thus content creation is not just SEO copywriting.On the Web most people only offers empty bottles with labels. Content creation means offering the wine to your readers. They will taste it, tell their friends and this way you get the desired publicity including the long term positive SEO effects like links and social media saturation.Business blogging is probably the most important basic content creation technique everybody serious about it should utilize. Blogging creates an audience for you. The people are crucial in reaching everybody else. They are your ambassadors. Nobody believes corporate execs and sales people. Readers trust bloggers they know due to their writing.Team work is essential for most content based campaigns based on more than blogging. Advanced content types like videos, infographics or widgets at least require a marketing/SEO practitioner and a videographer, graphic designer or programmer respectively.Whenever you create a piece of content you have to ask yourself: What problem does it solve? What need does it cover? Who will read it and why? Why should the reader tell others about it? The best piece of content isn’t en content anymore, it’s a poem, a work of art or a game. Especially art works and games spread like wildfire by themselves on the Web.Believe it or not but press releases still exist and make sense when done right. Old school SEOs tend to use press releases as keyword rich nonsense only automated services reproduce. A well written press release entices to republish it by the press and more than that bloggers. So called social media press releases combined with blogger relations work even better for content marketing nowadays.Another practice believed to be dead is alive and kicking: email marketing. Professional email marketing tool like Aweber and MailChimp allow you connect with your preferred audience directly via their mailbox. Most people don’t use RSS to this day. Email is the number way to reach a broad main stream audience. Use your blog to build an email list and promote your content.RSS and syndication are nonetheless one of the most important pillars of content marketing and promotion. RSS is used by the elite Web users. Those influencers and connectors who spread the so called word of mouth. Ever since Google Reader allows to share items RSS has become in a way a social media channel of its own. Make sure your rank first for content you syndicate though.Social Media, including social networking (Facebook, MySpace) social news (Twitter, Digg), social bookmarking (Delicious), social browsing/discovery, microblogging (Tumblr), media sharing (YouTube, Flickr, Scribd), niche communities and forums offer a huge potential for spreading content. You have to choose a few of those media sites and services your audience already is on build a reputation there as a contributing user. Make sure to use each site exactly the way it was meant to. Submitting your link to “100 social bookmarking sites” is spam. Promote only your valuable content.If content is king, viral content is the emperor. Viral content is the ultimate kind of content. A kind of content that spreads by itself after an initial push by the SEO campaign. Rich media tend to become viral content. Images, videos, infographics get shared via a myriad of ways once they get viral. Text by itself often doesn’t go viral but text images o for instance. text can be altered but other media formats are complete in a way and can’t be easily edited. That makes them more likely to get shared instead. On the other hand campaigns for user contributions have proven the most viral in many cases. The IKEA Facebook tagging example is one of the best here.Images: photos and illustrations are probably the most shared type of media content. Content theft abounds though so make sure to make your images trackable and findable for people who’ll discover it without a source. Add your URL to the image. Glennz is a great example for using images this way.Videos are the most powerful media format by now. You can literally reach millions of viewers with your message with a movie. A video can also be a screencast or just you talking in front of a camera. The most popular non-profit marketing video last year was a wedding dance.Infographics are booming on the Web for at least one year now and there is no end in sight. They work perfectly on social media and provide value for both readers and marketers alike even taken out of context. Many SEO practicioners rely on infographics to get links and traffic. There are already tools and tutorials for to creating your own infographic.Ebooks and white papers, checklists and cheat sheets are the evergreens of successful content. The PDF format has been indexed well by Google even before the dawn of Universal Search and you can find them in regular organic search results in the top 10 by now. Some of the most linked to resources are ebooks in the PDF format.Widgets are the SEO’s best friend as long as the links included aren’t leading to unrelated third party sites. Interactive widgets in a way automate link building without solely relying on automation as people themselves include them on their sites and spread them. Widgets can be useful or playful. They can capitalize on vanity (as in “how much is your site worth”). They have to fulfill a function though. Useless widgets just created to build links won’t work. It’s as simple as that.What are the most important take aways for your SEO via content campaigns?

Content is king but can’t win by itself like in Chess.
Don’t take content for granted.Don’t mistake sales copy for content.create valuable content professionally.
Promote your great content using several techniques.
Use different content types.
Without proper content your SEO campaign is like selling empty bottles.

Do you have more insights or resources to add? Add them in the comments.

Tags: content creation, content marketing, content promotion, content seo, content strategy
Posted in blogging, seo |


View the original article here

Thursday, 14 October 2010

Clever Tricks You Can Do With Google Alerts

This is a guest post from Kelvin Newman at Site Visibility.

Google Alerts is one of the most powerful tools made available from our friends at Mountain View, but despite it’s huge potential it’s largely under-rated and doesn’t get the appreciation or the acknowledgement it deserves.

It’s been around for donkey’s years but is still in Beta, and the chances are you’re using it already in a simple way, perhaps to keep track of your own name to see whether there’s a Footballer in Spain with your name or a namesake who’s running for the local council.

You might even have it running for your companies brand name to keep tabs on any good or bad press you’re getting.

And if you aren’t doing either of those two things stop reading this article now (we’ll wait for you) and go and get that set up before you do anything else.

Seriously sort it out now…

But I wanted to share with you just a few of the cleverer ways it can be used that will surprise you and almost certainly make you life a bunch easier.

Using Google Alerts to Find Out If You’ve Been Hacked

With everyone switching to WordPress as a CMS there’s a very real danger of more sites getting hacked. It seems currently the main reason people are hacking WordPress sites is to fill them with links to websites in the less savoury corners of the web.

They’re even clever enough to cloak your website so only search engines can see the links and they are invisible to you.

So how do you find out if your website has been attacked bar waiting for your rankings to tank for linking to spam sites?

You can use a Google Alert, rather than entering a simple keyword set up your Google alert using site:yourdomain.com then add multiple keywords like viagria, cialis web cams,  etc. If you add OR in caps lock between the words then it will look for any mentions of they keywords on your site.

Essentially you’re setting up a system which says email me whenever you find any of these dodgy words on my site, you might mention them innocently and get an alert but if something untoward is going on this should give you a early warning.

The only real downside is Google have already spotted the problem so it may already be too late.

This is a great little tip with a hat tip to Patrick.

Using Google Alerts to Find Out Who’s Linking to You

You no doubt know that search google with link:yourdomain.com will give you a rough approximation of some of the links pointing at your site. It’s no big secret that the data you get from this search is a little flawed, but setting up a Google Alert with this syntax is not a bad way to find out about some new links you’ve attracted.

Keep Track of Your Competitors Links

You can use exactly the method discussed above to keep track of new inbound links to your competitor sites, this method is arguably it’s even more valuable. If you discover they’ve had a series of infographics which have gone viral perhaps you should be exploring a similar approach, or maybe competitions are leading to high quality editorial links? Well then you should get your thinking cap on.

Find out Every-time Google Index a new Page of Your Site.

A real trend I’ve seen over recent months is websites suffering from decreasing number of indexed pages in Google, in most cases this hasn’t adversely influenced their search traffic or search entry pages but is still an issue of concern. Do you have a system in place to monitor whether your pages are getting indexed as you hope? or are you just submitting an XML site map and crossing your fingers? If you set up a Google alert for site:yourdomain.com you’ll get a notification every time a page is indexed, which will help spot any indexing issues you may be suffering from.

Use Google Alerts to Keep Track of Changing Content with RSS feeds

There’s certain areas to certain websites that you’d really like to keep track of but for what ever reason don’t have RSS feeds, I’ve found this a lot in press centre sections of company websites, for example.

It can be really helpful to get updated whenever a new page is added to this section of the site. Again a bit of clever Google Alerts syntax can help you. Setting one up for a query like site:theirdomain.com/press-centre/ would do the trick nicely.

See not bad for a free tool that’s been in beta for donkey’s years.

Posted in google, link building, seo |


View the original article here

Saturday, 9 October 2010

How to Use Yahoo Pipes To Track Potential Questions on Yahoo Answers

This is a guest post from Kelvin Newman at Site Visibility.

I’m starting to feel a bit sorry for Yahoo, not only are they seen by most people as a bit of a joke, largely the stick is unwarranted. They’ve got some great little products and services, two of which I use to this great little way of keeping tracking of easy social media interaction opportunities.

The main service is Yahoo Answers, its a hugely popular social site where users ask and answer questions. If you’ve not checked Yahoo Answers recently, go over now and have a look, there will be dozens of people asking questions related to your industry – no matter how obscure or niche it is.

The nightmare though is having to revisit the site everyday to see whether there’s anything new or relevant. Fortunately the main categories have RSS feeds so you could set up the feed in your RSS reader to keep track of the mentions in your chosen category, but your a busy digital marketer, you don’t have time to check through every question asked on the site. That’s where Yahoo Pipes comes in.

If you’ve never heard of Yahoo Pipes don’t worry, nobody has. It’s simple tool which allows you to do some very simple filtering and sorting of web data like RSS feeds. It can do some pretty clever tricks but what we want it to do is really simple. Take a feed from Answers, search for any questions that contain your keywords, discard those without and deliver those that do into a new RSS stream.

Start by dragging and dropping the a fetch feed icon from the side bar into the main screen. This will then create a box with a text field. Cut and paste the feed url from your most relevant category in Yahoo Answers. If more than one category is applicable click the addition/plus symbol and it’ll add a new text field for another category.

Next click the Operators expanding button in the side bar, find the filter button and drag and drop it between the Fetch Feed Box and Feed Output. It’ll have a text field you can type the word or phrases you want to monitor for. The drop down fields give you flexibility whether you want to look just in the Question Title and/or description Etc.

You can add more than one keyword by clicking the plus symbol, it gets quite clever now as well, you could filter questions that include SEO and PPC or you could set it up for questions that include SEO or PPC. It’s pretty self explanatory when it’s in front of you.

Now you need to connect the feed to the filter and from the filter to the out put. Click the circle and the bottom of the feed fetcher and drag it to the start of the filter, then do the same from the filter to the output. It should look something like the picture below.

Nearly there now, just save the pipe and hit the ‘Run this Pipe’ button. This will take you to a page where you can subscribe to this new feed. But I’m too lazy/busy to check my feedreader daily, so I take it a step further and use FeedMyInbox to take the feed address and email me whenever there is a suitable question.

Clever time saving trick which with a little tweaking you can use on dozens of social sites with RSS feeds. Do you monitor any social sites like this? Any tips to save time checking back for opportunities?

Posted in Social SEO, search engine marketing, seo, social media, yahoo, yahoo search marketing |


View the original article here

Tuesday, 5 October 2010

5 Ridiculous SEO Myths Spread in 2010 by Web Designers, Bloggers and Journalists

Steve Rubel and his ridiculous ‘SEO is dead’ escapade during the Google Instant presentation is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to articles about SEO from outsiders.

Now that SEO has gone mainstream and everbody deals with it many people write about SEO who have barely a clue about it. Others, often web designers who know the basics of SEO from 5 or 10 years ago spread their outdated advice today.

Journalists, bloggers from outside the industry and writers for publications completely unrelated to SEO attempt to “join the conversation”. I have no problem with that.

Make your homework first though and then write. Also make sure to accept feedback. Some bloggers don’t like me pointing out their mistakes and delete my comments instead. Thus I decided to write about it where they can’t.

Another reason to speak up on these SEO myths is that most of them get wildly popular on Twitter. The examples below have garnered hundreds of retweets during the last two weeks.


1. Meta keywords matter for SEO via Mens News Daily

They don’t. SEO practicioners have been saying this for years and Google itself as well as as other search engines have confirmed: Meta keywords are dead as a SEO tactic. Even the meta description does not actually help you to rank better it can only make people click your your result.

-

2. You need to “submit your site to social bookmarking sites“ (like Digg, Reddit, StumbleUpon) via 1stWebdesigner and Helium

First off you don’t submit to social bookmarking sites. Social bookmarking is guess what, about bookmarking! So you actually bookmark a site or rather a page as is more often the case. I use Delicious every day for that purpose like most other people. You can encourage people to bookmark you by different means but submitting your site like it’s a directory or something is SPAM.

Then Digg, Reddit and StumbleUpon are not bookmarking at all. The 1stWebdesigner author doesn’t even mention Delicious. Digg and Reddit are social news and StumbleUpon is social browsing/social discovery. On all of these sites ”submission of sites” for SEO reasons is frowned upon and that’s certainly not the way SEO works there. SEO on Digg means a clever linkbait headline or striking infographic. Digg ignores such submissions but on Reddit and StumbleUpon you get downright banned for “submitting s” as if it was a directory.

-


3. SEO is only about “top positions” via Webdesignerdepot

I didn’t know whether I should cry or laugh. Another hugely popular web design blog offers a whole post of bogus SEO advice o rather anti-SEO myths. The post starts with the false assumption that SEO is only about top positions and that SEO companies only care for those. How wrong can you get? Most reputable SEO agencies preach usability, conversions and ROI for years, including SEOptimise. Just stop lying pal. I don’t even believe you can be that wrong without lying on purpose. Show me SEO companies that only care top position and I show you those living in the past.

-

4. “SEO is evil” via Business Insider

Wow. Here you have an article by one of the brightest minds i the SEO industry and what does the editor do? S/he apparently changes the headline in order to capitalize on the anti-SEO prejudice wide spread on the Web. SEO is evil? Why then does Google itself publish SEO advice regularly? Please read the Google SEO starter guide [PDF link] first before even considering to meddle with legitimate SEO articles. Also reread the original headline of the post you completely reverted the meaning of: Why Journalists Need To Stop Resenting SEO.

-

5. Local SEO is not SEO via Worcester Business Journal

This one is ridiculous. This journalist claims that you can rank without SEO by using local SEO. As she apparently doesn’t even know that local SEO exists she denounces SEO altogether. Awful ignorance, just awful. You can get your Google Places listing without an SEO professional but to actually rank with it you need a lot specialized local SEO tactics. Enough said.

-

You surely wonder why I don’t link to the above mentioned articles. It’s becacuse every link counts as a vote for Google and any publicity. In case you know these publications I advise you to stop reading them as they spread lies, myths and misconceptions that will cost you money!

Also don’t spread such stories on Twitter. You’re just showing how clueless you are when it comes to SEO.

Tags: 1stwebsdesigner, business insider, helium, mens news daily, seo is dead, seo myths, steve rubel, webdesignerdepot, worcester business journal
Posted in blogging, linkbait, seo |


View the original article here

Friday, 1 October 2010

40 Title Tag SEO for Google Ranking Factors & Optimization Techniques + Resources

Tweet Posted on August 31st, 2010 by Tad Chef

A few months ago one of my clients has changed platforms. The new platform changed almost everything we’ve optimized on-site for years. It even messed up the obvious SEO basics like title tags and we’re struggling with them to this day as the platform maker insisted that title tags “get assigned automatically” in their system.

While title tag optimization is the daily bread of every SEO, for many people, like

software vendorscontent creatorsbusiness leaders

title tags appear to be completely random and negligible. They assume that

title tags won’t get even really seen by the average user so why bother with them at all?

They forget that title tags get displayed in search results on Google and elsewhere and that it’s still one of the most important ranking factors for Google.

Also it’s not just one ranking factor.

There at least around 30 signals from the title tag alone if you ask me. Thus I decided to list what I perceive to be the 40 title tag SEO for Google ranking factors and optimization techniques plus resources every website owner should consider. Many are common sense by now, others will be new to some people. Also I added some factors I personally assume to count on Google. I have no objective proof for those but I hope you will provide their own opinion on them.

Not all title tag optimization techniques are ranking factors for Google but they need to be implemented as well in a thorough on-site SEO campaign.

Exact Match (of search query) – When your title tag matches the search query exactly than it’s 100% relevant for it. Example: searching for [seo news] without brackets would match a page with SEO News as a title tag. Nothing more or less.
Keyword Order – On Google it’s first come, first serve. The first word in the title tag is most relevant. So in case you want to rank for [seo news] you better write “SEO News” in your title tag and not “News SEO”.
Keywords vs Keyphrases – As we have seen in the examples above we in most cases attempt to rank for keyphrases containing two or more terms not single word keywords. You won’t rank for [seo] or [news] easily anyways unless you are Wikipedia or CNN so you better target keyphrases not just keywords.Collocations and Compounds – Many keyphrases are just phrases for the sake of SEO but many others are already a combination linguistically. Many of them are not yet phrases but they are collocations (two or more words often used together) or compounds (one term consisting of two or more words). In English it is often difficult to find out whether you are using a collocation or a compound but in other languages it is. “Blue sky” is a collocation but “skyscraper” is a compound. Here you can spot it easily because it’s one word. Google users are often looking for compounds and collocations. So you want to write “blue sky” in your title to rank for it instead of “blue, sky”.
Modifiers (like “cheap” or buy) – There are common modifiers many searchers look for. In case you have an e-commerce website you certainly have users who are seeking “cheap [insert your product here]” or “buy [insert your product here]“. Google also tries to extract the searcher’s motivation from such queries. A search like [seo wikipedia] is different than [cheap seo] or [seo.com]. Depending on the query Google will attempt to find the right kind of website. So when you sell something you better add the appropriate modifier.
Length (70 characters) – Google will only show 70 characters on its search results page (SERP) so you want to make sure that the most important stuff is at the beginning while the brand is at the end. This item has been suggested http://twitter.com/SorbetDigital/statuses/22072297138Stop Words – Stop words are words that get ignored by Google, or are not useful in the title tag and search results itself in most cases. “And” is such a word. The less of them the better but some people really search for phrases containing stop words. In these cases you may rank better when you actually use one. “SEO UK” is not the same as “SEO in the UK”.
Numbers – Numbers, that is digits, not written numbers, are quite popular on the Web these days, especially on social media. The top 10 ways to do something are better than just ways to do it. When it comes to search though most people don’t use numbers or digits. On the other hand your click through rate (CTR) might still depend on the numbers contained in your title tag. Would you prefer 10, 30 or 101 ways to do something? It depends on the context but in many cases you will go for the higher number as a searcher.
Hyphens – While in English people don’t use as many hyphens as for instance in German using a hyphen is a good way to rank for different keyphrases while only adding it once. For instance sports-car in your title tag would be both recognized as [sports car] and [sportscar] in search results. While this works sometimes without the hyphen workaround in many cases you need to assist Google to rank for both versions of a keyphrase.
Commas – Commas are not a good way to separate your keywords in the title tag. Google basically discounts title tags with commas as a useless list of keywords. A comma is not only a waste of space in your title tag it raises a red flag: Your title tag appears to be a victim of keyword stuffing, a search engine spam “technique” from a decade ago.
Pipes – Many people prefer to use pipes as separators these days, that is using this character here “|” as in “SEO|PPC”. A pipe has no particular meaning beyond just “separator”. This is both a pro as a con. Some SEO practitioners advise not to use them at all because otherwise you look like an SEO and get down-ranked for that. This may be a “conspiracy theory” but the pipe is usually not used in written language so that it looks a bit artificial. While I sometimes use it I prefer hyphens and slashes in many cases.
Slashes – Everybody uses slashes “/” in URLs. You can use them in title tags as well and even be grammatically correct. A slash basically means “and” or “or”. I often use a slash for synonyms or for lists of phrases.
Other Separators – There are others separators you van use in your title tag. A plus “+”, a dot “.”, a number sign “#”, an ampersand or angle quotes “<”, “>” that can be used, especially when combined. Something like Search Marketing > SEO > Onsite Optimization can make sense in a title tag. This example also looks similar to a breadcrumbs menu so that people can recognize it’s meaning as a hierarchy. This item has also been suggested by @rishilMisc. Special Characters – There are special characters out there that can lead to trouble though, either by not being displayed correctly by browsers itself or by confusing the search engines. Thus using very exotic special characters may have a negative impact. They can stick out as well and get the searcher’s attention on the other hand.
Blanks/Spaces – Most people use blanks or spaces as separators by default. As long as the title tag reflects a sentence structure it works quite well as in “the sky is blue”. Some people tend to list keywords using spaces though. The outcome is something like this: “SEO Services SEO Company India Search Engine Optimization (SEO) India”. While such a title may rank well, it’s #1 for [seo india] right now, the very poor readability and spammy appearance will result in a lower CTR. Keyword Proximity – Not only keyword order is important also keyword proximity. A title tag like “SEO blog” will rank better for the keyphrase [seo blog] than “SEO, PPC and social media marketing blog” not only due to the number of keywords contained and thus lack of focus but also because the words “SEO” and “blog” are very wide apart.
Keyword Repetition – A few years ago it was a best practice to repeat your keyword twice in your title tag once varying it slightly. In recent years Google recognizes more and more variations. Thus you don’t have to repeat as many of them anymore. Keyword repetition can have both a positive or a negative impact on your ranking. Especially repeating a keyword more than twice can lead to a penalty for keyword stuffing, unless it really makes sense semantically.
Title Tag Repetition – By title tag repetition I mean repeating the same title tag on the same page. Many people accidentally use the same title tags on two or more pages. This is in most cases bad for your SEO when it comes to Google. Google will display just two results from the same site so having more than two pages with the same title tag does not make sense. It’s just duplicate content. You can assign the same title tag to the print version of your document but even there you can change it slightly by adding the obvious “print version” modifier. Each title tag should be unique.
Singular, plural – The most accepted method of repetition in one and the same title tag is the singular/plural variation. Example: iPhone/iPhones. It’s been widely used in recent years but Google does a better job by now of finding both the singular and plural versions independently from the query unless it really matters. Someone searching for [paris hotels] e.g. is looking for a list of them while a searcher typing [paris hotel] just searches for the best or most renowned one. This item has also been suggested http://twitter.com/jaamit/statuses/22076224296
Synonyms – Synonyms are another legitimate way to add repetition to the title tag. Cars/Autos or Bikes/Bicycles are good examples here. Some SEO practicioners use multiple of them. I am by now not as fond of this technique anymore as Google recognizes more and more synonyms by now. This item has also been suggested http://twitter.com/rishil/statuses/22072178107
Acronyms – Acronyms or abbreviations get treated almost like synonyms. Just search for [search engine optimization] and you’ll notice that some snippets in the SERPS only contain the acronym “SEO”. Depending on your priorities you can add both, the complete term and the abbreviations or just the acronym. In case you want to save space you can rank for the whole keyphrase just by using the acronym. Otherwise you can repeat your keyphrase once using the whole term, once only the short version.
Brand Names – In recent months Google has actually more than once changed the way it treats brand names in search results. The trend is to focus more on brands than solely on generic keywords and phrases. A brand can actually boost your organic ranking when many people already search for it. Don’t rely solely on generic terms in your title tag. Try to use a brand, be it a personal brand or a corporate one.
Domain Matching – Exact match domains have a strong advantage in search results on Google and elsewhere. A domain like SEO.com greatly improves your ranking for a generic term like [seo] as long as you don’t make some big mistakes elsewhere in your SEO campaign.Domain Mentioning – Does the domain mention the keyword? It doesn’t have to match it completely. A combination like brandseo.com or seo-brand.com is good enough to be mentioned in the title tag along the actual keyphrase. A title tag like “SEO Services by Cool-SEO.com” can give you an additional boost on Google.
URI Matching – Some people will disagree but IMHO title tags matching the actual URL structure are better than those that don’t match it. This may look a bit automated and get down-ranked on large scale websites but on small business sites it’s the way to go. So when your URL is domain.com/seo-services add “SEO Services” to your title tag as well.
h1/2 etc. Matching – Again, this here is my own opinion. Matching h1 or h2 tags on your page will support your title tag as a ranking factor. On the other hand when they don’t match you lose out a bit of relevancy.
Text Matching – Content should always reflect the title tag. In pages where there is not a single mention of the keyphrase found in the title tag, the title tag itself won’t have as much of an impact.
Relevancy – Google may select the display title tag from three different places – The website, DMOZ, or it may be auto generated by Google depending on which Google deems most relevant. This item has been suggested http://twitter.com/GuavaUK/statuses/22074127880
Advanced SEO for title tags

Additional title tag optimization resources from elsewhere in the SEO industry:


Do you have something to add about title tags and SEO? Do it in the comments please! I may add it to the post itself.

Posted in google, seo |


View the original article here