Wednesday, 15 December 2010

Is Google Instant aimed at killing “I Feel Lucky” & making more money?

By now I’m sure everyone’s all seen and had a play around with the new Google Instant search interface. There’s lots of early reaction to this on the web, my own included on Econsultancy yesterday.

Obviously the main goal behind this is to provide results much more quickly and look to improve a searchers overall user experience. But has anyone else noticed that the “I feel lucky”, while still listed on the homepage, is actually now redundant?

Google Don't Be Evil
Image credit: Flickr

In my opinion, the majority of Google’s changes and updates look to achieve one of two things:

improve the relevancy of results for searchers, andmake more money

Ideally both!

However, Google Instant is about increasing speed and reducing the user journey required for searchers. But interestingly it looks like it will make them more money too.

By providing results as soon as you start typing, the new search function now bypasses the “I feel lucky” button, which has cost Google an incredible estimated $110 million dollars in potential revenue in the past! Any good conversion optimisation specialist (or accountant) would tell you to remove that button – which is effectively what Google have done. The only way you can click the “I feel lucky” button now is for an empty query string on the Google homepage, and this just takes you to the Google logos page.

So that’s clearly a great way of generating extra revenue and that’s all before taking into account the extra paid search ads being served for each query and the potential extra interstitial clicks generated while mid-query.

Also, for Google – the main reason they are such a huge money-making machine is their huge market share? As I mentioned in my Econsultancy comments, if Instant has a negative reaction this could be a good time for users to switch (most likely to Bing). So how this affects the user has to be the main objective first and foremost. Increasing the average value per searcher is also a goal they will be keen on improving further, and rightly so, but it does little to their revenue if the market share drops as a result.

So what do you think, is a major increase in revenue a key and intentional part of Google’s thinking in the launch of Instant?

Posted in google, seo |


View the original article here

Sunday, 12 December 2010

The Swiss Army Knife Of SEO Tools!

Here's How Even The Laziest, Most Technophobic Internet Marketer Can Almost Automatically Get All The High-Quality, Relevant Incoming Links You Want... Climb Your Way To The Top Of SEO Pile... And Drive More Qualified, Profitable And Free Traffic To Your Site...
Without Paying Out The Nose For A High Priced SEO "Expert"...

Without Spending All Your Time Suffering And Struggling In SEO Land...

And Faster Than You Ever Thought Possible Before! 


Friday, 10 December 2010

Top 10 tips & things you need to know about AdWords Remarketing

Tweet Posted on August 17th, 2010 by Rob Hillyard

This is a guest post from Rob Hillyard at Return on Digital.

AdWords Remarketing

Create a brand new campaign for Remarketing. This will enable you to monitor how everything is doing much easier than running it within an existing campaign.You need at least 500 people in your target list before Google will start to show your ads. Depending on how much traffic your site gets and who you are targeting, it could take a couple of days before you see any traffic.Image ads work best. Make sure you include all the possible image sizes to allow your ads to receive the largest amount of impressions possible.Use a different message than your standard ads to bring the users back to your site. This is your second chance to convert the visitor into a customer. Special offers / discounts work well.If you include an offer in your ad make sure you mirror this offer on your landing page.Plan who you want to remarket to. You need to know your strategy before you start your implementation.A Good place to start is to remarket to people who visited your site but didn’t convert.Control how long people will see your remarketing ads for. Being constantly targeted by one advertiser can be annoying and you don’t want to put people off your brand.Your ads may be displayed on sites that wouldn’t normally be seen as relevant. This is ok. Users are targeted based on previous interactions with your site rather than the content of the website.Your ads will follow your users around sites within the Google Content Network. This can be quite annoying. Consider allowing users to opt out. http://www.google.com/ads/preferences/view

For the full guide on how to set up Remarketing, check out this post.

Posted in google, google adwords, ppc |


View the original article here

Tuesday, 7 December 2010

Top SEOptimise posts in July – a monthly recap…

Tweet Posted on August 5th, 2010 by Kevin Gibbons

a4uexpoJuly has been another busy month at SEOptimise – and seeing that we are currently writing around the web, I thought it would be a good time to share these posts with SEOptimise readers and recap on the top posts we’ve written here on the blog.

Plus I have been confirmed as a speaker at a4uexpo London in October, this is on the “20 Social Media Tools & 20 WordPress Plugins Boost Your Performance” day two session. We also sent out the latest installment of the SEOptimise newsletter yesterday – signup here if you haven’t already!

SEOptimise around the web…

For those who do not follow my writing on Econsultancy or Search Engine Watch, here are the latest posts from July – plus an interview on State of Search:

Top SEOptimise posts in July

Oh and plus the office have followed the foursquare craze this week, with the race on to become the mayor of SEOptimise!

Posted in seoptimise |


View the original article here

Thursday, 2 December 2010

How to Manage & Grow Your Social Media Network

Tweet Posted on September 20th, 2010 by Kevin Gibbons

One of the problems and frustrations I find with social media, is that there are now many different website’s and each of them require managing contacts in different ways.

So, for example, you’ll often end up with a completely different set of contacts on each site – when in many cases it would make far more sense if you were just connected to the same people on Twitter, LinkedIn, Foursquare etc.

Because each of these sites have their own friend/follow system, it’s pretty much impossible to keep track of everyone you’re connected to. This means that if you sign-up for a new social media website, like I did recently on FourSquare, you have to start all over again by adding contacts from scratch.

It is possible to import friends on many of the sites by importing your Twitter or Facebook contacts – but that doesn’t always allow for everyone you’re connected with elsewhere. Recently, I’ve tried to manage this in a more central location, using the following steps:
Go export crazy! The first step is to get an email list of contacts from Facebook, LinkedIn and any other social media sites with contact list exporting available. Sometimes you have to dig around for export options, but it’s normally available – even if they do try to insult you through not so subtle captchas!
LinkedInCollect all contacts into GMail or FlowTown - This helps you to organise all of your contacts into a single location. Personally I find FlowTown to be very useful – especially for analysing demographics – but GMail does the job here too and is free (FlowTown charges per import).
FlowtownGroup contacts - Filter those who you’d like to connect with on all sites and if you want to be more selective over who you connect with, then it’s useful to separate professional contacts with friends and family.
FlowtownImport connections – most social networking sites have the option to import contacts via CSV or GMail – so once you’ve collected and organised all of your contacts into a central location you can look to import these into each of the social media website’s you use.
Twitter Import

I tried this out a few weeks ago on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, StumbleUpon and Foursquare – instantly finding new contacts who I’m already connected to on other sites. So from my point of view, it’s been a far more efficient way of managing and merging social contacts – has anyone found a good way of managing contacts across social media networks?

Posted in social media |


View the original article here